Teachers’ Perceptions and Observed Practices of Deep Learning in Elementary School Teaching

A Qualitative Study at Sekolah Dasar Negeri 060971

Authors

  • Reno Simanullang Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas, Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67507/jupen.v2i04.408

Keywords:

Deep Learning, Elementary Education, Teacher Perception, Classroom Observation, Meaningful Learning, Professional Development

Abstract

Deep Learning (DL) has increasingly become an important pedagogical orientation in elementary education because it emphasizes meaningful understanding, inquiry, reflection, collaboration, critical thinking, creativity, and real-life learning application. However, the implementation of DL in elementary classrooms depends strongly on teachers’ conceptual understanding, instructional readiness, classroom strategies, leadership support, and the availability of learning resources. This study explores teachers’ perceptions and observed practices of Deep Learning at Sekolah Dasar Negeri 060971. The study employed a qualitative descriptive case study design supported by classroom observation scores. The participants consisted of 20 elementary school teachers, one headmaster, and two vice headmasters. Data were collected through semi-structured teacher interviews, a 15-item classroom observation checklist, and leadership interviews. The interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis, while observation scores were analyzed descriptively using mean scores and categorical interpretation. The findings revealed that teachers understood Deep Learning as meaningful, reflective, student-centered, inquiry-oriented, and conceptually deep learning rather than memorization-based instruction. Teachers perceived DL as important for developing students’ critical thinking, engagement, independence, collaboration, creativity, responsibility, and real-life understanding. Observation data showed that DL practices were highly observed overall, with an average score of 3.68 out of 4.00. The strongest observed indicators were effective classroom management, active student engagement, critical thinking encouragement, and constructive feedback, while technology integration and student reflection were comparatively lower, although still categorized as highly observed. Leadership interviews confirmed that school leaders supported DL through training, mentoring, supervision, technology integration, and school policies, but challenges remained in time allocation, resources, assessment procedures, curriculum demands, and sustained professional development. The study concludes that Deep Learning at SD Negeri 060971 has been positively perceived and substantially practiced, but its sustainability requires stronger teacher training, clearer assessment guidance, improved technology access, collaborative planning, and continuous school-based professional learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arianti, C. A. L. E., Sama’, S., & Dewi, I. Y. M. (2025). Navigating deep learning pedagogy in rural classrooms: A qualitative study on teacher readiness and innovation in Indonesian elementary schools. Journal Evaluation in Education, 6(3), 725–736. https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v6i3.1775

Becker, S., Klein, P., Gößling, A., & Kuhn, J. (2020). Using mobile devices to enhance inquiry-based learning processes. Learning and Instruction, 69, 101350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101350

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in reflexive thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Byrne, D. (2022). A worked example of Braun and Clarke’s approach to reflexive thematic analysis. Quality & Quantity, 56, 1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Harleni, H., Ganefri, G., Yulastri, A., Giatman, M., Irfan, D., & Effendi, H. (2025). Unveiling the impact of inquiry-based learning: A meta-analysis of student learning outcomes. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(3).

Hinostroza, J. E., Armstrong-Gallegos, S., & Villafaena, M. (2024). Roles of digital technologies in the implementation of inquiry-based learning: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100874

Jabbar, N. Q., Dewi, P., & Widodo, S. (2025). English teachers’ perceptions of implementing the deep learning approach in elementary schools. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(12), 13737–13745. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v8i12.9912

Jumelan, Aji, G. P., & Yayuk, E. (2025). Exploring senior and novice teachers’ perspectives on deep learning: A qualitative study in elementary schools. AL-MUADDIB: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.46773/muaddib.v7i4.2674

UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. UNESCO.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-19

How to Cite

Simanullang, R. (2026). Teachers’ Perceptions and Observed Practices of Deep Learning in Elementary School Teaching: A Qualitative Study at Sekolah Dasar Negeri 060971. Jurnal Pendidikan, Media, Strategi, Dan Metode., 2(04), 271–292. https://doi.org/10.67507/jupen.v2i04.408

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.